{Legal Issue} Off Leash Dogs

Thank you so much to everyone that contributed a question/suggestion for a legal topic for Rich and I to research.  I am excited to start tackling the issues!  We didn’t quite get as much as I was expecting, so we will “round up” a little and I’ll buy a jumbo bag of food from Costco next time we are there for donation.  Thank you all again!

IMG_2061

My plan is to address the topics in the order we received them, with one exception: today’s topic.  With warm weather upon on us, people and their pets are out en mass, and the likelihood increases for this type of situation to arise.  A reader posed the question:  What happens if I am walking my dog, on a leash, through our neighborhood and an off-leash dog comes up and causes my dog to bite it?  She also wanted to know if it is appropriate to remind the owner of the dog about leash laws.

IMG_2294

Does this happen to anyone else?

Before we address the question, it’s time for us to put in a boring disclaimer: please remember that Rich is not an attorney, but just a law student (for the next couple of months). Also, these posts should not be taken as legal advice, but just a general exploration of the issues that the post suggestions present. If you have an actual legal problem with your animal you should consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

So, to start with the easier of the two questions: YES, you absolutely should remind people of leash laws anytime you see them with an off-leash dog.  I know that I have been guilty of having my dogs off-leash at times in the past and it always annoyed me when someone would yell, “Your dog is supposed to be on a leash!”  But why?  My dogs are friendly!  Now, “My dog is friendly!” is one of my biggest pet peeve statements.  That’s good for you, but maybe the dog on the leash isn’t.  The fact is, not all dogs are accepting of other dogs greeting them (often exasperated by being on a leash), and you should never assume otherwise.  The odds are, the owner of the off-leash dog has no ill intentions and simply is unaware of the issue, like I used to be.  I would recommend keeping things light and friendly, but also trying to kindly make them aware of why leash laws are in place.  Maybe something like, “Hey neighbor!  I noticed your cute little ____ is running around without a leash.  My dog is friendly too, but there are some dogs who aren’t so friendly so it’s a good idea to just abide by the law which states dogs must be leashed.  You know, better safe than sorry!”

IMG_2291

Now back to the main question.  Generally speaking if an unleashed dog provokes a dog that is being walked on a leash and the leashed dog snaps and attacks the unleashed dog, then the owner of the leashed dog should not have too much of a problem on their hands. This is due to one of two legal defenses, either contributory negligence, or assumption of the risk. Under contributory negligence a jury would apportion the liability, and thus the damages, between the two parties based on how their actions contributed to the bite. For assumption of the risk, the owner of the unleashed dog has assumed the risk of his or her dog getting attacked, by allowing it to roam free.  Additionally, where a state has enacted a statute to provide for owner-liability for dog attacks, it may have also enacted other statutory defenses to liability.

IMG_2056

Specifically in Florida there is a statute that provides for strict liability for the owner of a dog that attacks a domestic animal or person. Additionally there is a leash law in Leon County that requires dogs to be kept on a leash when they are off of their property. Florida courts have said that since it is a statutory action for damage caused by a dog attack, a defense of contributory negligence cannot be maintained in Florida. There are also very limited statutory defenses that have been enacted by the Florida lawmakers. However, Florida courts have decided that assumption of the risk and provocation are defenses that can be maintained under the strict liability statute. Thus a court would allow evidence to be brought forward that the owner of the unleashed dog assumed the risk that an attack would occur, and that the unleashed dog provoked the leashed dog into attacking. Ultimately it would be up to the jury to determine if the provocation was sufficient enough to cause the attack.

IMG_2288

Nevertheless, all of this analysis may be unnecessary though, because if there is an attack that just injures another dog, the possible damages available, which are likely only the medical bills of the injured dog, would not be enough to justify court costs and legal fees to maintain a lawsuit.

So kids, play it safe and keep your dog on a leash!  Questions?  Hit me with your best shot.

IMG_2389

13 thoughts on “{Legal Issue} Off Leash Dogs

    • It varies but generally speaking even in public parks they need to be leashed unless they are in a designated “pet” area. I’ve noticed that if you look for them, there usually are signs stating “All dogs must be leashed” or something like that.

  1. I often wonder this when I walk my own dog. There are too many ppl in my neighborhood that just let their dogs run. We have be approached by running dogs at us, thus I walk with a break stick. However, being the mom to a bully type dog, I believe my dog and I would still be liable simply because of my dogs “appearance”. What are your thoughts on that? Even though my dog and I were following the laws by walking on a leash and my dog not being aggressive yet we are being approached by a loose dog and out of protection, mine would snap, what chance we would stand?

    Bren @ Pibbles & Me

    • I absolutely understand and share your fear. I don’t know where you live, so this is a general response, but normally if there were any dog bite and the “victim” pursued you, it would go to a judge and/or jury to determine liability. In a perfect world, since your dog was leashed and following the law, they would find no damages against you. In the imperfect world we live in, it’s scary to say, but I think it would just come down to the individuals. We unfortunately know the kind of prejudice that is out there regarding our beloved “bullies” and it’s entirely possible that some or all of the fault could be assigned to you. Obviously this is sh!tty and I only hope and pray none of us ever find ourselves in this situation. In the mean time, I think the best thing we can do is continue trying to raise awareness about how GOOD our “bullies” are in hopes that if ever we found ourselves in front of a jury, the jury would be comprised of fellow “bully” lovers!

      • Thanks Morgan. You share my same thoughts, thus again, me walking with a break stick. If a dog came close enough to attack, I would sure to push my boy back and clobber the attacking dog. Then might go take the stick to the owners as I’m always telling them “Leash your dogs and/or fence your dang yard!” Ugh, it’s really disheartening.

  2. Great advice about what to say to the owners of off-leash dogs! I never know what to say and usually just stand there and pray Lana doesn’t snap when they come bounding over. (Despite what I JUST said about not tensing when you anticipate trouble, I often do.) =P

  3. @LLCD There may be specific dog parks in your area that allow for off leash play. As far as public city and state parks and beaches, your dog may need to be on leash. Ask the specific park directly. When in doubt, leash. *I’m not a lawyer, just a pet parent.*

  4. Awesome post. I really like your way of telling people to put their dog on a leash. Being a parent/foster of bully breeds my guys are always on leash unless in the fields out behind our house. Due to the BSL here even walking your dogs in public can be a pain due to prejudice against bully breeds.

  5. Pingback: Preaching to the Choir | Temporary Home, Permanent Love

  6. Thank you so much for giving us such important info!! When I see my neighbors walk their dogs without leashes, I often fall into the bad habit of just keeping things to myself due to fear of confrontation or just an awkward moment. However, your post has reminded me that this important law exists for the benefit of the dogs, so an awkward moment is always better than a dog being bitten, or worse.

  7. Pingback: Here’s To Rich | Temporary Home, Permanent Love

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s